This article from the science section of the New York Times addresses the revolutionary idea of treating wastewater into drinkable water.
During this period of population growth and climate change, usable water is becoming a precious resource. Within 25 years water availability will change drastically unless necessary measures are taken. This article addresses these issues but was it in an informative and objective manner? Did the author of this article present a strong counter argument? What did you think of the kicker and how did this make you as the reader feel? Did the lede grab your attention/ was it effective or too subtle?